Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor targeting peptide-elastin fusion polypeptides and their self-assembled nanostructures

ABSTRACT

Disclosed is a fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization, including a peptide specifically binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, and a hydrophilic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophilic EBP) linked to the peptide.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 15/744,278, filed on Jan. 12, 2018, which was a national stage of PCT application No. PCT/KR2016/011757, filed on Oct. 19, 2016, and claims priority to and the benefit of Korean Patent Applications Nos. 10-2016-0042655 and 10-2016-0135510, filed on Apr. 7, 2016 and Oct. 19, 2016, respectively, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

SEQUENCE LISTING

This divisional application contains a Sequence Listing submitted via EFS-Web and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The Sequence Listing is named DAH-266NPD1-2A_Sequence_Listing_Revised.txt, created on Jun. 25, 2020, and 66,430 bytes in size.

BACKGROUND 1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a fusion polypeptide and a self-assembled nanostructure for inhibiting neovascularization, and more particularly, to a fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization including a peptide specifically binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors; and a hydrophilic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophilic EBP) linked to the peptide.

In addition, the present invention relates to a fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization including a peptide specifically binding to VEGF receptors; a hydrophilic EBP linked to the peptide; and a hydrophobic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophobic EBP) linked to the hydrophilic EBP, and a self-assembled nanostructure thereof.

2. Discussion of Related Art

Peptides, polypeptides and proteins having specific functions, such as cell penetration, cell attachment, binding affinity to target molecules, therapeutic efficacy, and site-specific conjugation, may be fused together to form a multifunctional artificial chimera or fusion protein suitable for smart drug delivery systems.

Such fusion proteins exhibit high specificity, high activity, long half-lives, low accumulation in certain organs, and low side effects when used in vivo. Recently, multifunctional fusion proteins have been prepared at the genetic level with recombinant DNA technology and the following are precisely regulated: (1) sequence and composition of amino acids, (2) fusion order, (3) monodisperse molecular weight, (4) hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity, (5) environmental responsiveness, (6) biocompatibility and biodegradability, (7) toxicity and immunogenicity, (8) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

The fusion proteins are expressed in high yield (0.1 to 0.5 g per liter of culture) in prokaryotic or eukaryotic expression systems, and are purified by column chromatography or inverse transition cycling (ITC) for analyzing unique phase transition behaviors induced by stimuli-responsiveness of the fusion proteins. For example, antimicrobial host-defense peptides were genetically fused with polypeptide F4 to overcome limitations of the host-defense peptides, such as low stability, short half-lives and high production cost. Furthermore, tumor-targeting antibodies were prepared in mice using a hybridoma technology, and antigen-binding variable domains of mouse antibodies were combined with human IgG to reduce immunogenicity in patients. A large number of artificial fusion proteins are in preclinical and clinical development, and technologies using multi-functional artificial chimeric or fusion protein-based therapeutics are growing exponentially.

Elastin-based polypeptides (EBPs) are thermal response biopolymers derived from elastomeric domains. Elastin is a major protein component of the extracellular matrix (ECM). EBPs are modified to have thermal sensitivity based on an elastomeric domain and are composed of a pentapeptide repeat unit, Val-Pro-(Gly or Ala)-X_(aa)-Glys[VP (G or A)XG]. EBPs are thermally responsive polypeptides, and transition temperatures thereof are readily controlled to form nanostructures for drug delivery.

X_(aa) is a guest residue and may be any amino acid except proline. Depending on a sequence corresponding to the repeat unit, there are two types of EBPs, one is an elastin-based polypeptide with elasticity (EBPE) with a sequence of Val-Pro-Gly-X_(aa)-Gly and the other is an elastin-based polypeptide with plasticity (EBPP) with a sequence of Val-Pro-Ala-X_(aa)-Gly.

EBPs exhibit a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior in which a reversible phase transition is observed depending on temperature. The LCST provides the advantage of using an easy purification method such as inverse transition cycling (ITC) and the advantage of being thermally triggered to self-assemble into particles, gels, fibers and other structures.

Diblocks composed of EBP blocks that have different sequences are used to form self-assembled structures. An EBP diblock copolymer is composed of two EBPs, in which the EBPs have different sequences and different transition temperatures (Ti) to form a self-assembled micellar structure. When the temperature of an EBP diblock copolymer solution increases above a lower T_(t), EBPs that have a low T_(t) become insoluble whereas EBPs that have a high T_(t) are soluble, and amphiphilic diblock EBPs are self-assembled into micellar structures. EBP diblock copolymers may be fused with other functional peptides, e.g., a cell penetrating peptide capable of penetrating cells, to have functional multivalency as micellar structures.

Soluble EBPs may be used as inert protein-based biomaterials, like poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), and as drug delivery carriers with drugs or other functional proteins, for advanced drug delivery systems, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering.

EBPs may be easily purified and have stimuli-triggered phase transitions, allowing for genetic fusion with other functional proteins and exploitation of the advantages of EBPs. For example, EBPs may be fused with an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) to create an injectable drug reservoir for treating osteoarthritis.

In addition, with the advancement of therapeutic EBP fusion proteins, self-assembled micelles of EBP block copolymers are being studied. An EBP diblock copolymer is composed of two different EBP blocks, each of which has a different sequence, configuration and chain length, which allows each EBP block to have a unique transition temperature (T_(t)). When temperature rises, the EBP block with a low T_(t) becomes insoluble, while another EBP block with a high T_(t) becomes soluble above the low T_(t). Due to the amphiphilic properties of the EBP diblock copolymer above the low T_(t), the EBP diblock copolymer self-assembles into a core-shell micellar nanostructure. In addition, EBP diblock copolymers may be fused with other functional peptides or proteins to become functionally multivalent. Both the core and shell of the EBP micellar nanostructure may be used differently as drug delivery carriers.

Recently, a considerable number of cancer-related diseases have been known to result from abnormal neovascularization in tumors. Physiological neovascularization in organisms is strictly regulated and is only activated under specific conditions. However, excessive formation of blood vessels due to disruption of regulation may lead to diseases such as non-tumor diseases as well as cancers. Under physiological conditions, including development, growth, wound healing, and regeneration, neovascularization is stimulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF binds to two types of VEGF receptors (VEGFRs), including VEGFR1 (fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 or Flt1) and VEGFR2 (kinase insert domain-containing receptor or Flk-1/KDR), present on cell membranes. Selective binding of VEGF to VEGF receptors delivers a growth signal to vascular endothelial cells, which in turn triggers neovascularization.

Therefore, to inhibit neovascularization in various diseases such as tumor growth, cancer metastasis, retinal neovascularization, corneal neovascularization, diabetic retinopathy and asthma, various strategies for anti-neovascularization have been employed. In particular, anti-neovascularization strategies for treatment of ocular neovascularization include initiating a signal that inhibits neovascularization using neovascularization inhibitors such as pigment epithelial-derived factor (PEDF) and caffeic acid (CA), and blocking neovascularization signals by interfering with binding of VEGF to receptors thereof (VEGFRs). In particular, since biomacromolecules and targeting peptides have high affinity for VEGFR1 and competitively bind to VEGFR1 as receptor antagonists, using biomacromolecules or targeting peptides as antibodies may be a challenging strategy related to interfering with binding of VEGF to VEGF receptors.

An anti-Flt1 peptide identified by PS-SPCL (positional scanning-synthetic peptide combinatorial library) screening, one among high throughput screening (HTS) systems, is a hexa-peptide having an amino acid sequence of Gly-Asn-Gln-Trp-Phe-Ile (GNQWFI). The anti-Flt1 peptide, as a VEGFR1-specific antagonist, specifically binds to VEGFR1, which prevents VEGFR1 from interacting with all VEGFR1 ligands, including placental growth factor (PIGF), as well as VEGF. To increase the half-life of the anti-Flt1 peptide in vivo, anti-Flt1 peptide-hyaluronate (HA) conjugates have been studied in connection with the formation of self-assembled micelle structures which encapsulate genistein, dexamethasone or tyrosine-specific protein kinase inhibitors. Although conjugation of the anti-Flt1 peptide with HA polymers increases the half-life of the anti-Flt1 peptide in the body, conjugation efficiency and micellar structures are heterogeneous due to polydisperse HA polymer molecular weights, random distribution, and inconsistency of conjugation efficiency of the anti-Flt1 peptides and the HAs.

The present inventors have continued to study fusion polypeptides for inhibiting neovascularization. As a result, a novel fusion polypeptide in which a peptide targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors and an elastin-based polypeptide were fused was developed and the present invention was completed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Therefore, the present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and it is an objective of the present invention to provide a novel fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization.

It is another objective of the present invention to provide a self-assembled nanostructure of the fusion polypeptide.

It is still another objective of the present invention to provide a composition for treating diseases caused by neovascularization.

It is yet another objective of the present invention to provide a method of inhibiting neovascularization in individuals.

According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization, including:

a peptide specifically binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors; and

a hydrophilic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophilic EBP) linked to the peptide.

The peptide specifically binding to VEGF receptors may be a peptide that specifically binds to VEGF receptor Flt1 or Flk-1/KDR.

The peptide specifically binding to VEGF receptors may be a peptide that specifically binds to VEGF receptor Flt1 or Flk-1/KDR, and is also called “VEGF receptor-specific peptide” or “VEGF receptor-targeting peptide”. The VEGF receptor-specific peptide may be any of anti-Flt1 or anti-Flk-1/KDR (poly)peptides well known in the art. For example, the peptide may be an anti-Flt1 peptide [SEQ ID NO. 38], but is necessarily limited thereto.

The hydrophilic EBP may be composed of an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 1 or 2 below:

Formula 1 [SEQ ID NO. 1]n; or   Formula 2 [SEQ ID NO. 2]n, wherein   SEQ ID NO. 1 is consisted of [VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG];   SEQ ID NO. 2 is consisted of [VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG];

n is an integer of 1 or more, and represents the number of repeats of SEQ ID NO. 1 or SEQ ID NO. 2; and

X is an amino acid other than proline, is selected from any natural or artificial amino acid when the pentapeptide VPGXG or VPAXG is repeated, and at least one of X is a hydrophilic amino acid.

The hydrophilic EBP may be composed of an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 1 or 2 below:

in Formula 1, n is 1, each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of,

A (Ala), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 20];

K (Lys), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 22];

D (Asp), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 24]; or

E (Glu), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 26],

or

in Formula 2, n is 1, and the pentapeptide repeats

in Formula 2, n is 1, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of,

A (Ala), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 21];

K (Lys), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 23];

D (Asp), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 25]; or

E (Glu), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 [SEQ ID NO. 27].

The hydrophilic EBP may include an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 2 below:

in Formula 2, n is 3, 6, 12 or 24, and the pentapeptide repeats

correspond to SEQ ID NO. 41, SEQ ID NO. 42, SEQ ID NO. 43 or SEQ ID NO. 44 and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is composed of A (Ala), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1 or

in Formula 2, n is 12, and the pentapeptide repeats

correspond to [SEQ ID NO. 45] and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is composed of E (Glu), G (Gly), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 1:4:1.

The fusion polypeptide according to the present invention may further include a hydrophobic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophobic EBP) linked to the hydrophilic EBP.

That is, the fusion polypeptide may include of the following:

a peptide specifically binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors;

a hydrophilic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophilic EBP) linked to the peptide; and

a hydrophobic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophobic EBP) linked to the hydrophilic EBP.

The hydrophobic EBP may include an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 1 or 2 below:

Formula 1 [SEQ ID NO. 1]n; or   Formula 2 [SEQ ID NO. 2]n, wherein   SEQ ID NO. 1 is consisted of [VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG];   SEQ ID NO. 2 is consisted of [VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG];

n is an integer of 1 or more, and represents the number of repeats of SEQ ID NO. 1 or SEQ ID NO. 2; and

X is an amino acid other than proline, is selected from any natural or artificial amino acid when the pentapeptide VPGXG or VPAXG is repeated, and at least one of X is a hydrophobic or aliphatic amino acid.

The hydrophobic EBP may be consisted of an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 1 or 2 below:

in Formula 1, n is 1, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of,

G (Gly), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 29];

K (Lys), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 30];

D (Asp), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 31];

K (Lys) and F (Phe) in a ratio of 3:3 [SEQ ID NO. 32];

D (Asp) and F (Phe) in a ratio of 3:3 [SEQ ID NO. 33];

H (His), A (Ala), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 3:2:1 [SEQ ID NO. 34];

H (His) and G (Gly) in a ratio of 5:1 [SEQ ID NO. 35]; or

G (Gly), C (Cys), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 36].

The hydrophobic EBP may include an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 2 below:

in Formula 2, n is 12, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of G (Gly), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 46], or

in Formula 2, n is 24, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of

G (Gly), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 47].

In one embodiment, the fusion polypeptide of the present invention may be composed of an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ ID NO. 48, SEQ ID NO. 49, SEQ ID NO. 50 or SEQ ID NO. 51. That is, the fusion polypeptide may be represented as follows:

the fusion polypeptide includes,

an anti-Flt1 peptide; and a hydrophilic EBP [A₁G₄I₁]₃ linked to the anti-Flt1 peptide, and represented by [SEQ ID NO. 48];

an anti-Flt1 peptide; and a hydrophilic EBP [A₁G₄I₁]₆ linked to the anti-Flt1 peptide, and represented by [SEQ ID NO. 49];

an anti-Flt1 peptide; and a hydrophilic EBP [A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ linked to the anti-Flt1 peptide, and represented by [SEQ ID NO. 50]; or

an anti-Flt1 peptide; and a hydrophilic EBP [A₁G₄I₁]₂₄ linked to the anti-Flt1 peptide, and represented by [SEQ ID NO. 51].

In another embodiment, the fusion polypeptide of the present invention may include an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ ID NO. 52 or SEQ ID NO. 53. That is, the fusion polypeptide may be represented as follows:

the fusion polypeptide includes,

an anti-Flt1 peptide; a hydrophilic EBP [E₁G₄I₁]₁₂; and a hydrophobic EBP [G₁A₃F₂]₁₂, and represented by [SEQ ID NO. 52]; or

an anti-Flt1 peptide; a hydrophilic EBP [E₁G₄I₁]₁₂; and a hydrophobic EBP [G₁A₃F₂]₂₄, and represented by [SEQ ID NO. 53].

According to the present invention, the fusion polypeptide composed of a VEGF receptor-specific peptide; a hydrophilic EBP; and a hydrophobic EBP may form a self-assembled nanostructure having a core-shell structure, when the hydrophobic EBP forms a core structure and the hydrophilic EBP and the VEGF receptor-specific peptide form a shell structure by a temperature stimulus.

The self-assembled nanostructure may include a multivalent VEGF receptor-specific peptide as a shell.

Specifically, an anti-Flt1 peptide which is a VEGF receptor-specific peptide is exemplified. A fusion polypeptide composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide; a hydrophilic EBP; and a hydrophobic EBP may form a self-assembled nanostructure having a core-shell structure, when the hydrophobic EBP forms a core structure and the hydrophilic EBP and the anti-Flt1 peptide form a shell structure by a temperature stimulus.

The self-assembled nanostructure may include a multivalent anti-Flt1 peptide as a shell, which provides greatly enhanced binding affinity to VEGF receptors.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a composition for treating diseases caused by neovascularization, including the fusion polypeptide.

According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of inhibiting neovascularization in individuals, including a step of administering the therapeutic composition to individuals.

When a fusion polypeptide composed of a VEGF receptor-specific peptide; and a hydrophilic EBP is exemplified, the VEGF receptor-specific peptide of the fusion polypeptide may be non-covalently bound to a VEGF receptor to inhibit neovascularization (FIGS. 5A to 5D).

In addition, an example of a fusion polypeptide composed of a VEGF receptor-specific peptide; a hydrophilic EBP; and a hydrophobic EBP is as follows.

The fusion polypeptide may form a self-assembled nanostructure having a core-shell structure, when the hydrophobic EBP forms a core structure and the hydrophilic EBP and the VEGF receptor-specific peptide form a shell structure by a temperature stimulus, and

the self-assembled nanostructure may include a multivalent VEGF receptor-specific peptide as a shell, whereby binding affinity between the self-assembled nanostructure and a VEGF receptor increases, and VEGF fails to bind to the VEGF receptor, thereby inhibiting neovascularization.

The diseases caused by neovascularization may be any one or more selected from the group comprising diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity, macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, neovascular glaucoma, eye diseases caused by corneal neovascularization, corneal transplant rejection, corneal edema, corneal opacity, cancer, hemangioma, hemangiofibroma, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis, but are necessarily limited thereto.

The term “vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)” used in the present invention refers to a factor that stimulates new blood vessel formation. VEGF binds to VEGF receptors to deliver a growth signal to vascular endothelial cells, which in turn triggers neovascularization.

The fusion polypeptide of the present invention functions to prevent VEGF from binding to VEGF receptors.

The term “amino acid” used in the present invention refers to a natural or artificial amino acid, preferably a natural amino acid. For example, the amino acid includes glycine, alanine, serine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, glutamine, asparagine, cysteine, histidine, phenylalanine, arginine, tyrosine, tryptophan and the like.

The properties of these amino acids are well known in the art. Specifically an amino acid exhibits hydrophilicity (negative or positive charge) or hydrophobicity, and also exhibits aliphatic or aromatic properties.

As used herein, abbreviations such as Gly (G) and Ala (A) are amino acid abbreviations. Gly is an abbreviation for glycine, and Ala is an abbreviation for alanine. In addition, glycine is represented by G and alanine by A. The abbreviations are widely used in the art.

In the present invention, “hydrophilic amino acid” is an amino acid exhibiting hydrophilic properties, and includes lysine, arginine and the like.

In addition, “hydrophobic amino acid” is an amino acid exhibiting hydrophobic properties, and includes phenylalanine, leucine and the like.

The term “polypeptide” used herein refers to any polymer chain composed of amino acids. The terms “peptide” and “protein” may be used interchangeably with the term polypeptide, and also refer to a polymer chain composed of amino acids. The term “polypeptide” includes natural or synthetic proteins, protein fragments and polypeptide analogs having protein sequences. A polypeptide may be a monomer or polymer.

The term “phase transition” refers to a change in the state of a material, such as when water turns into water vapor or ice turns into water.

The polypeptide according to the present invention is basically an elastin-based polypeptide (EBP) with stimuli-responsiveness. The “elastin-based polypeptide” is also called “elastin-like polypeptide (ELP)”. The term is widely used in the technical field of the present invention.

In the present specification, X_(aa) (or X) refers to a “guest residue”. Various types of EBPs according to the present invention may be prepared by variously introducing X_(aa).

EBP undergoes a reversible phase transition at a lower critical solution temperature (LCST), also referred to as a transition temperature (T_(t)). EBPs are highly water-soluble below T_(t), but become insoluble when temperature exceeds T_(t).

In the present invention, the physicochemical properties of EBPs are mainly controlled by combination of a pentapeptide repeat unit Val-Pro-(Gly or Ala)-X_(aa)-Gly. Specifically, the third amino acid of the repeat unit is responsible for determining the relative mechanical properties of the EBPs. For example, according to the present invention, the third amino acid Gly is responsible for determining elasticity, or Ala is responsible for determining plasticity. Elasticity and plasticity are properties that appear after a phase transition occurs.

In addition, the hydrophobicity of a guest residue X_(aa), the fourth amino acid, and multimerization of a pentapeptide repeat unit all affect T_(t).

The EBP according to the present invention may be a polypeptide composed of pentapeptide repeats, and a polypeptide block, i.e., an EBP block, may be formed when the polypeptide is repeated. Specifically, a hydrophilic or hydrophobic EBP block may be formed. The hydrophilic or hydrophobic properties of an EBP block according to the present invention are closely related to the transition temperature of the EBP.

The transition temperature of the EBP is also determined by the amino acid sequence of the EBP and the molecular weight thereof. A number of studies on the relationship between an EBP sequence and T_(t) have been conducted by Urry et al (see Urry D. W., Luan C.-H., Parker T. M., Gowda D. C., Parasad K. U., Reid M. C., and Safavy A. 1991. TEMPERATURE OF POLYPEPTIDE INVERSE TEMPERATURE TRANSITION DEPENDS ON MEAN RESIDUE HYDROPHOBICITY. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113: 4346-4348.). According to the above reference, when, in a pentapeptide of Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly, the fourth amino acid, a “guest residue”, is replaced with a residue that is more hydrophilic than Val, T_(t) is increased compared to the original sequence. On the other hand, when the guest residue is replaced with a residue that is more hydrophobic than Val, T_(t) is decreased compared to the original sequence. That is, it was found that a hydrophilic EBP has a high T_(t) and a hydrophobic EBP has a relatively low T_(t). Based on these findings, it has become possible to prepare an EBP having a specific T_(t) by determining which amino acid is used as the guest residue of an EBP sequence and changing the composition ratio of the guest residue (see PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS: A MOLECULAR CLONING MANUAL, 2002, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Chapter 18. pp. 329-343).

As described above, an EBP exhibits hydrophilicity when the EBP has a high T_(t), and hydrophobicity when the EBP has a low T_(t). Similarly, in the case of the EBP block according to the present invention, it is also possible to increase or decrease T_(t) by changing an amino acid sequence including guest residues and a molecular weight thereof. Thus, a hydrophilic or hydrophobic EBP block may be prepared.

For reference, an EBP having T_(t) lower than a body temperature may be used as a hydrophobic block, whereas an EBP having T_(t) higher than a body temperature may be used as a hydrophilic block. Due to this property of EBPs, the hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of EBPs may be relatively defined when EBPs are applied to biotechnology.

Taking EBP sequences according to the present invention as an example, when a plastic polypeptide block in which a plastic pentapeptide of Val-Pro-Ala-X_(aa)-Gly is repeated is compared with an elastic polypeptide block in which an elastic pentapeptide of Val-Pro-Gly-X_(aa)-Gly is repeated, the third amino acid, Gly, has higher hydrophilicity than Ala. Accordingly, the plastic polypeptide block (elastin-based polypeptide with plasticity: EBPP) exhibits a lower T_(t) than the elastic polypeptide block (elastin-based polypeptide with elasticity: EBPE).

EBPs according to the present invention, as described above, may exhibit hydrophilic or hydrophobic properties by adjusting T_(t) and may be charged using charged amino acids.

Fusion polypeptides according to the present invention is schematically shown in FIGS. 5b and 5c . According to the present invention, an EBP was fused to an anti-Flt1 peptide that specifically binds to VEGF receptors (VEGFRs). Using the fusion polypeptide of the present invention, VEGF does not bind to VEGFRs, and thus neovascularization may be inhibited.

The term “EBP diblock” used herein refers to a block composed of “hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP”, and is also called “EBP diblock copolymer”, “EBP diblock block”, “diblock EBP” “diblock EBPs” or “diblock EBPPs”.

The present invention relates to a new class of genetically encoded “stimuli-responsive VEGFR-targeting fusion polypeptides”.

In one embodiment, specifically, the fusion polypeptide is composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide acting as a receptor antagonist targeting VEGFR1 and a hydrophilic EBP block as a soluble unimer.

In another embodiment, the fusion polypeptide is composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide acting as a receptor antagonist targeting VEGFR1; a hydrophilic EBP block; and a hydrophobic EBP block. The EBP diblock of the hydrophilic EBP block and the hydrophobic EBP block contributes to the formation of a temperature-triggered core-shell micellar structure.

When using a fusion polypeptide composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide and a hydrophilic EBP block, a strong non-covalent interaction between VEGFR1 and the anti-Flt1 peptide domain of the fusion polypeptide occurs.

In addition, a fusion polypeptide composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide; a hydrophilic EBP block; and a hydrophobic EBP block may form a temperature-triggered core-shell micellar structure with a multivalent anti-Flt1 peptide under physiological conditions, which may increase the binding affinity of the fusion polypeptide for VEGFR1.

Therefore, the fusion polypeptide of the present invention may be presented as a polypeptide drug for treating neovascularization-related diseases.

The fusion polypeptide of the present invention may overcome the following limitations that arise when conventional peptide drugs and peptide-polymer conjugates are applied to in vivo treatment: (1) rapid clearance by proteases; (2) time consuming and costly conjugation and purification; (3) random distribution and (appearing upon polymerization of various polymers and peptide drugs) inconsistent conjugation efficiency; and (4) heterogeneous micellar structures due to polydisperse molecular weights thereof.

The present invention provides a VEGFR-targeting fusion polypeptide composed of thermally responsive elastin-based polypeptides (EBPs) and a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeting peptide. The fusion polypeptide of the present invention was genetically engineered, expressed and purified, and the physicochemical properties thereof were analyzed. The EBPs were introduced as non-chromatographic purification tags and were also introduced as a stabilizer, like a poly(ethylene glycol) conjugate, for minimizing rapid in vivo degradation of VEGFR1-targeting peptides. In addition, the VEGFR-targeting peptide was introduced to function as a receptor antagonist by specifically binding to VEGFRs. A fusion polypeptide composed of a VEGFR-targeting peptide-hydrophilic EBP block exhibited a soluble unimer form. On the other hand, a fusion polypeptide composed of VEGFR-targeting peptide-hydrophilic EBP block-hydrophobic EBP block exhibited a temperature-triggered core-shell micellar structure with a multivalent VGFR-targeting peptide under physiological conditions. As analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), these structures increased the binding affinity of a fusion polypeptide for VEGF receptors (see Examples below). Depending on the spatial display of a VEGFR-targeting peptide, the binding affinity of the VEGFR-targeting peptide to VEGFRs was greatly regulated. The present invention shows how the binding affinity of a VEGFR-targeting peptide can be regulated based on multivalency.

A therapeutic composition including a fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization according to the present invention is a pharmaceutical composition. The pharmaceutical composition may include the fusion polypeptide and other materials that do not interfere with the function of the composition used in vivo for inhibiting neovascularization. Such other materials are not limited and may include diluents, excipients, carriers and/or other inhibitors of neovascularization.

In some embodiments, the fusion polypeptides for inhibiting neovascularization of the present invention are formulated for conventional human administration, for example, by formulating the fusion polypeptides with a suitable diluent, including sterile water and normal saline.

Administration or delivery of a therapeutic composition according to the present invention may be performed through any route so long as target tissues can be reached through that route. For example, the administration may be performed by direct injection into a target tissue (e.g., cardiac tissue) such as topical or intradermal, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intraarterial, intracoronary, intrathymic or intravenous injection, or intravitreal injection. The stability and/or potency of the fusion polypeptide disclosed in the present invention allow for convenient administration routes including subcutaneous, intradermal, intravenous and intramuscular routes.

The present invention provides a method of delivering a fusion polypeptide (e.g., as a part of a composition or formulation described herein) into cells, and a method of treating, alleviating, or preventing progression of a disease in a subject. The term “subject” or “patient” used in the present invention refers to any vertebrate animals, including, without being limited to, humans and other primates (e.g., chimpanzees and other apes and monkey species), farm animals (e.g., cows, sheep, pigs, goats and horses), domestic mammals (e.g., dogs and cats), laboratory animals (e.g., rodents such as mice, rats and guinea pigs) and birds (e.g., domestic, wild and game birds such as chickens, turkeys and poultry, ducks, geese, and the like). In some embodiments, the subject is a mammal.

In another embodiment, the mammal is a human.

A fusion polypeptide or pharmaceutical composition of the present invention may contact a target cell (e.g., a mammalian cell) in vitro or in vivo.

According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treating or preventing diseases caused by neovascularization, the method including a step of administering a therapeutic composition according to the present invention to individuals.

For clinical use, the fusion polypeptide of the present invention may be administered alone via any suitable route of administration effective to achieve a desired therapeutic result or may be formulated into a pharmaceutical composition. The administration “route” of the oligonucleotides of the present invention may include enteral, parenteral and topical administration or inhalation. Among the administration routes of the fusion polypeptide of the present invention, enteral includes oral, gastrointestinal, intestinal, and rectal. Parenteral routes include ocular injection, intravenous, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intraspinal, subcutaneous, topical, vaginal, topical, nasal, mucosal and pulmonary administration. The topical route of administration of the fusion polypeptides of the present invention refers to external application of the oligonucleotides into the epidermis, mouth and ears, eyes and nose.

The therapeutic composition may be administered by parenteral, oral, transdermal, sustained release, controlled release, delayed release, suppository, catheter or sublingual administration.

When the fusion polypeptide included in the therapeutic composition is administered in combination with other drugs, the fusion polypeptide may be administered in an amount of 15 μg/kg or less when injected intravenously, and may be administered in an amount of 2.5 μg or less when injected intravitreally.

The present invention is further illustrated by the following additional examples which should not be construed as limiting. It should be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes to the specific embodiments disclosed may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention in the light of the present invention and that equivalent or similar results may be obtained.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. In general, the nomenclature used herein is well known and commonly used in the art.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram and an adapter sequence for construction of plasmids encoding EBP gene libraries with different DNA sizes. (A) an adapter sequence for modification of a pET-21a plasmid, (B) a scheme for modification of a pET-21a plasmid for seamless gene cloning, (C) a scheme for inserting a monomer EBP gene into a modified pET-21a vector, and (D) a scheme for construction of plasmids encoding EBP gene libraries with different DNA sizes;

FIG. 2 shows the agarose gel electrophoresis images of EBP gene libraries used in the present invention. (A) EBPE[A₁G₄I₁], (B) EBPP[A₁G₄I₁], (C) EBPE[K₁G₄I₁], (D) EBPP[K₁G₄I₁], (E) EBPE[D₁G₄I₁], (F) EBPP[D₁G₄I₁], (G) EBPE[E₁G₄I₁], (H) EBPP[E₁G₄I₁], (I) EBPP[G₁A₃F₂], (J) EBPP[K₁A₃F₂], (K) EBPP[D₁A₃F₂], and (L) EBPP[H₃A₂I₁]. The number of EBP repeat units was indicated below each DNA band. Two side-lanes on all agarose gels represent different DNA size markers (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 kbp, from bottom to top);

FIG. 3 shows the copper-stained SDS-PAGE gel (4 to 20% gradient) images of EBPs used in the present invention. (A) EBPE[A₁G₄I₁], (B) EBPP[A₁G₄I₁], (C) EBPE[K₁G₄I₁], (D) EBPP[K₁G₄I₁], (E) EBPE[D₁G₄I₁] and (F) EBPP[D₁G₄I₁]. Two side-lanes on SDS-PAGE gels contain standard protein size markers (7, 15, 24, 35, 40, 50, 65, 90, 110, and 150 kDa, from bottom to top);

FIGS. 4A to 4F show the thermal profiles of EBPs used in the present invention. FIG. 4A shows the profiles of EBPE[A₁G₄I₁]_(n), FIG. 4B shows the profiles of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(n), FIG. 4C shows the profiles of EBPE[K₁G₄I₁]_(n), FIG. 4D shows the profiles of EBPP[K₁G₄I₁]_(n), FIG. 4E shows the profiles of EBPP[D₁G₄I₁]_(n), and FIG. 4F shows the profiles of EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]_(n). To obtain thermal profiles, 25 μM EBP solutions were prepared in PBS buffer or PBS buffer supplemented with 1 to 3 M sodium chloride, and the optical absorbance of the EBP solution was measured at 350 nm while heating the solution at a heating rate of 1° C./min;

FIGS. 5A to 5D are schematic diagrams of cloning, molecular structures, and functions of fusion polypeptides composed of EBPPs and an anti-Flt1 peptide. In FIG. 5A genes encoding EBPP diblocks were constructed, and a gene encoding an anti-Flt1 peptide was cloned into a plasmid including a gene encoding an EBPP diblock. In FIG. 5B fusion polypeptides composed of anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP; and anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP. In FIG. 5C fusion polypeptides composed of anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP were able to form a micellar structure by a temperature stimulus. In FIG. 5D (i) fusion polypeptides composed of anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP were able to bind to VEGFRs, and were able to inhibit interactions between VEGFR1 and VEGF. (ii) The micellar structures of fusion polypeptides composed of anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP were able to bind to VEGFRs, and was able to inhibit interactions between VEGFRs and VEGF with increased affinity due to the multivalency of the anti-Flt1 peptide;

FIG. 6 shows (A) agarose gel (1%) images and (B) SDS-PAGE (4 to 20% gradient) gel images. (a) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃, (b) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₆, (c) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and (d) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄;

FIG. 7 shows the LCST of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: integer) and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: integer) as turbidity profiles. Turbidity profiles were determined by measuring the absorbance of (A to C) 25 μM EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: integer) and (D to F) 25 μM anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: integer). The absorbance was measured at 350 nm in 10 mM PBS (A and D), 10 mM PBS supplemented with 1 M sodium chloride (B and E), and 10 mM PBS supplemented with 2 M sodium chloride (C and F), while heating samples at a heating rate of 1° C./min;

FIG. 8 shows the (A) agarose gel (1%) images and the (B) SDS-PAGE (4 to 20% gradient) gel images of fusion polypeptides. (A) A modified pET21-a (+) plasmid encoding anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ or anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ was digested by XbaI and BseRI. (B) The fusion polypeptides were expressed in E. coli and purified by ITC. 4 to 20% gradient gels were visualized with copper stain. An expected molecular weight was indicated below the band;

FIG. 9 shows the turbidity profiles of EBPP diblocks depending on the presence or absence of an anti-Flt1 peptide. (A) The turbidity profiles of (a) 25 μM EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and (b) 25 μM EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄. (B) The turbidity profiles of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and (C) the turbidity profiles of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ were obtained for concentrations of 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μM in 10 mM PBS. Absorbance was measured at 350 nm while heating the samples at a rate of 1° C./min. A phase transition occurred twice. The first phase transition occurred as a result of hydrophobic block aggregation, the second phase transition was affected by polar EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂. As EBPP diblock concentration increased, the first and second T_(t) values thereof were lowered;

FIG. 10 shows the hydrodynamic radius of (a) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and (b) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄, and the hydrodynamic radius was measured by a DLS instrument. The hydrodynamic radius of EBPP diblock polypeptides was measured at 25 μM in 10 mM PBS. The hydrodynamic radius of EBPP diblock polypeptides prior to the first phase transition is less than 10 nm, indicating that the polypeptides are present in a soluble unimer form;

FIG. 11 shows the in vitro biological activities of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₆, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄, which inhibit VEGFR1 binding to coated VEGF;

FIG. 12 shows the in vitro biological activities of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄, which inhibit VEGFR binding to coated VEGF. EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ were unimers at 37° C. On the other hand, anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ formed metastable micelles at 37° C., and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ formed stable micelles;

FIG. 13 shows the results of the in vitro tube formation assay of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂. (A) the fluorescence microscope images of calcein-AM-labeled HUVECs and (B) the degree of inhibition of tube formation. The degree of inhibition of tube formation was quantified from the images of (A). The tube length of HUVECs treated with anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ decreased with increasing the concentration of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]. The anti-Flt1-EBPP [A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ inhibited migration and tube formation of HUVECs. Tubing lengths are average values±SE. *P≤0.05 by a t test; and

FIG. 14 shows an in vivo inhibition effect of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ in a laser-induced choroidal neovascularization model. C57BL6 mice (n=3 per group) were treated with a vehicle (PBS), EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ (20 μg) or anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ (0.1, 1, 5 and 20 μg) after laser-induced injury, and the treatment was continued for 5 days. At day 14 after laser injury, mice were euthanized and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran perfused whole choroidal flat-mounts were prepared. The CNV lesion size was quantified by Nano-Zoomer and FISH. (A) representative flat mount fluorescence microscopic images. (B) a graph of the CNV size of each treated group. Each point corresponds to a CNV lesion, and a horizontal bar corresponds to the average value of each group. *P≤0.05 by an unpaired t test. The data represents two independent experiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS Example 1: Materials

A pET-21a (+) vector and BL21 (DE3) E. Coli cells were obtained from Novagen Inc. (Madison, Wis., U.S.). Top10 competent cells and calcein-AM were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif., U.S.) and HUVECs were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Virginia, U.S.). All customized oligonucleotides were synthesized by Cosmo GeneTech (Seoul, South Korea) and recombinant human VEGF-165 (rhVEGF₁₆₅) was obtained from Sino Biological Inc. (Beijing, China). Calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP), BamHI and XbaI were obtained from Fermentas (Ontario, Canada). AcuI and BseRI were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, Mass., U.S.). T4 DNA ligase was obtained from Elpis Bio-tech (Taejeon, South Korea). DNA miniprep, gel extraction, and PCR purification kits were obtained from Geneall Biotechnology (Seoul, South Korea). “Dyne Agarose High” was obtained from DYNE BIO, Inc. (Seongnam, South Korea). Top10 cells were grown in “TB DRY” media obtained from MO BIO Laboratories, Inc. (Carlsbad. Calif., U.S.). BL21 (DE3) cells were grown in “CircleGrow” media obtained from MP Biomedicals (Solon, Ohio, U.S.). “Ready Gels, Tris-HCl 2-20% precast gels” were from Bio-Rad (Hercules, Calif., U.S.). Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), kanamycin, polyethyleneamine (PEI), FITC-dextran, formalin and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Mo., U.S.). Matrigel was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, Calif., U.S.). Avastin, also known as bevacizumab was purchased from Roche Pharma Ltd. (Reinach, Switzerland). Ketamine was obtained from Huons (Seongnam, South Korea). Xylazine was purchased from BAYER (Leverkusen, Germany). Tropicamide was purchased from Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd (Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan). A stereomicroscope was obtained from Leica (Wetzlar, Germany). Recombinant human VEGF165 protein and recombinant human VEGF R1/Flt-1 F_(c) were purchased from R&D System (Minneapolis, Minn., U.S.). Rabbit anti-human IgG F_(c)-HRP chimeric protein and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was obtained from ThermoFisher (Massachusetts, U.S.).

Example 2: Notation for Different EBP Blocks and Block Polypeptides Thereof

Different EBPs having a pentapeptide repeat unit of Val-Pro-(Gly or Ala)-X_(aa)-Gly[VP (G or A)XG] are named as follows. X_(aa) may be any amino acid except Pro. First, pentapeptide repeats of Val-Pro-Ala-X_(aa)-Gly (VPAXG) with plasticity are defined as an elastin-based polypeptide with plasticity (EBPP). On the other hand, pentapeptide repeats of Val-Pro-Gly-X_(aa)-Gly (VPGXG) are called elastin-based polypeptides with elasticity (EBPEs). Second, in [X_(i)Y_(j)Z_(k)]_(n), the capital letters in the parentheses represent the single letter amino acid codes of guest residues, i.e., amino acids at the fourth position (X_(aa) or X) of an EBP pentapeptide, and subscripts corresponding to the capital letters indicate the ratio of the guest residues in an EBP monomer gene as a repeat unit. The subscript number n of [X_(i)Y_(j)Z_(k)]_(n) represents the total number of repeats of an EBP corresponding to SEQ ID NO. 1 [VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG] or SEQ ID NO. 2[VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG] according to the present invention. For example, EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ is an EBPP block including 12 repeats of a pentapeptide unit, SEQ ID NO. 2 [VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG], in which a ratio of Gly, Ala, and Phe at the fourth guest residue position (X_(aa)) is 1:3:2. Finally, EBP-EBP diblock polypeptides are named according to the composition of each block in brackets with a hyphen between blocks as in EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂.

Example 3: Preparation of Modified pET-21a Vector for Cloning Seamless Gene

4 μg of a pET-21a vector was digested and dephosphorylated with 50 U of XbaI, 50 U of BamHI and 10 U of a thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase in FastDigest buffer for 20 minutes at 37° C. The digested plasmid DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit, and then was eluted in 40 μl of distilled and deionized water. Two oligonucleotides with XbaI and BamHI compatible sticky ends were designed, i.e., SEQ ID NO. 39 (5′-ctagaaataattttgtttaactttaagaaggaggagtacatatgggctactgataatgatcttcag-3′) and SEQ ID NO. 40 (5-gatcctgaagatcattatcagtagcccatatgtactcctccttcttaaagttaaacaaaattattt-3). To anneal the two types of oligonucleotides, each oligonucleotide was prepared at a concentration of 2 μM in 50 μl of T4 DNA ligase buffer, heat treated at 95° C. for 2 minutes and then slowly cooled to room temperature over 3 hours. To ligate the annealed dsDNA, i.e., a DNA insert, into multiple cloning sites within the linearized pET-21a vector, 20 pmol of the annealed dsDNA and 0.1 pmol of the linearized pET-21a vector were incubated in T4 DNA ligase buffer containing 1 U of T4 DNA ligase for 30 minutes at 37° C. The modified pET-21a (mpET-21a) vector for cloning and expressing a seamless gene was transformed into Top10 competent cells, followed by plating the Top10 competent cells on a super optimal broth with catabolite repression (SOC) plate supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin. The DNA sequence of the mpET-21a vector was then verified by fluorescent dye terminator DNA sequencing (Applied Biosystems Automatic DNA Sequencer ABI3730).

Example 4: Synthesis of EBP Monomer Gene and Oligomerization Thereof

EBP sequences having a pentapeptide repeat unit, Val-Pro-(Gly or Ala)-X_(aa)-Gly, in which the fourth residues were varied in different molar ratios, were designed at the DNA level to optimize T_(t) below a physiological temperature. The DNA and amino acid sequences of EBPs with various pentapeptide repeat units for 17 EBP libraries are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

TABLE 1 Gene sequences corresponding to EBP libraries. Both EBPs with plasticity (EBPPs) having a pentapeptide repeat of  Val-Pro-Ala-X_(aa)-Gly, and EBPs with elasticity (EBPEs) having a pentapeptide repeat of Val-Pro-Gly-X_(aa)-Gly were cloned to have the same guest residue composition and ratio. SEQ ID EBP Gene Sequence NO. EBPE[A₁G₄I₁] GTC CCA GGT GGA GGT GTA CCC GGC GCG GGT GTC CCA GGT 3 GGA GGT GTA CCT GGG GGT GGG GTC CCT GGT ATT GGC GTA CCT GGA GGC GGC EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] GTT CCA GCT GGC GGT GTA CCT GCT GCT GCT GTT CCG GCC GGT 4 GGT GTT CCG GCG GGC GGC GTG CCT GCA ATA GGA GTT CCC GCT GGT GGC EBPE[K₁G₄I₁] GTT CCG GGT GGT GGT GTT CCG GGT AAA GGT GTT CCG GGT GGT 5 GGT GTT CCG GGT GGT GGT GGT GTT CCG GGT ATC GGT GTT CCG GGT GGC EBPP[K₁G₄I₁] GTT CCG GCG GGT GGT GTT CCG GCG AAA GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT 6 GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT GGT GTT CCG GCG ATC GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT GGC EBPE[D₁G₄I₁] GTT CCG GGT GGT GGT GTT CCG GGT GAT GGT GTT CCG GGT GGT 7 GGT GTT CCG GGT GGT GGT GGT GTT CCG GGT ATC GGT GTT CCG GGT GGC EBPP[D₁G₄I₁] GTT CCG GCG GGT GGT GTT CCG GCG GAT GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT 8 GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT GGT GTT CCG GCG ATC GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT GGC EBPE[E₁G₄I₁] GTT CCG GGT GGT GGT GTT CCG GGT GAA GGT GTT CCG GGT GGT 9 GGT GTT CCG GGT GGT GGT GGT GTT CCG GGT ATC GGT GTT CCG GGT GGC EBPP[E₁G₄I₁] GTT CCG GCG GGT GGT GTT CCG GCG GAA GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT 10 GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT GGT GTT CCG GCG ATC GGT GTT CCG GCG GGT GGC EBPE[G₁A₃F₂] GTC CCG GGT GCG GGC GTG CCG GGA TTT GGA GTT CCG GGT GCG 11 GGT GTT CCA GGC GGT GGT GTT CCG GGC GCG GGC GTG CCG GGC TTT GGC EBPP[G₁A₃F₂] GTG CCG GCG GCG GGC GTT CCA GCC TTT GGT GTG CCA GCG GCG 12 GGA GTT CCG GCC GGT GGC GTG CCG GCA GCG GGC GTG CCG GCT TTT GGC EBPP[K₁A₃F₂] GTG CCG GCG GCG GGC GTT CCA GCC TTT GGT GTG CCA GCG GCG 13 GGA GTT CCG GCC AAA GGC GTG CCG GCA GCG GGC GTG CCG GCT TTT GGC EBPP[D₁A₃F₂] GTG CCG GCG GCG GGC GTT CCA GCC TTT GGT GTG CCA GCG GCG 14 GGA GTT CCG GCC GAT GGC GTG CCG GCA GCG GGC GTG CCG GCT TTT GGC EBPP[K₃F₃] GTT CCA GCG TTT GGC GTG CCA GCG AAA GGT GTT CCG GCG TTT 15 GGG GTT CCC GCG AAA GGT GTG CCG GCC TTT GGT GTG CCG GCC AAA GGC EBPP[D₃F₃] GTT CCA GCG TTT GGC GTG CCA GCG GAT GGT GTT CCG GCG TTT 16 GGG GTT CCC GCG GAT GGT GTG CCG GCC TTT GGT GTG CCG GCC GAT GGC EBPP[H₃A₃I₁] GTG CCG GCG CAT GGA GTT CCT GCC GCC GGT GTT CCT GCG CAT 17 GGT GTA CCG GCA ATT GGC GTT CCG GCA CAT GGT GTG CCG GCC GCC GGC EBPP[H₅G₁] GTT CCG GCC GGA GGT GTA CCG GCG CAT GGT GTT CCG GCA CAT 18 GGT GTG CCG GCT CAC GGT GTG CCT GCG CAT GGC GTT CCT GCG CAT GGC EBPP[G₁C₃F₂] GTG CCG GCG TGC GGC GTT CCA GCC TTT GGT GTG CCA GCG TGC 19 GGA GTT CCG GCC GGT GGC GTG CCG GCA TGC GGC GTG CCG GCT TTT GGC

TABLE 2 Amino acid sequences corresponding to EBP libraries SEQ ID EBP Amino acid Sequence NO. EBPE[A₁G₄I₁] VPGGG VPGAG VPGGG VPGGG VPGIG VPGGG 20 EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] VPAGG VPAAG VPAGG VPAGG VPAIG VPAGG 21 EBPE[K₁G₄I₁] VPGGG VPGKG VPGGG VPGGG VPGIG VPGGG 22 EBPP[K₁G₄I₁] VPAGG VPAKG VPAGG VPAGG VPAIG VPAGG 23 EBPE[D₁G₄I₁] VPGGG VPGDG VPGGG VPGGG VPGIG VPGGG 24 EBPP[D₁G₄I₁] VPAGG VPADG VPAGG VPAGG VPAIG VPAGG 25 EBPE[E₁G₄I₁] VPGGG VPGEG VPGGG VPGGG VPGIG VPGGG 26 EBPP[E₁G₄I₁] VPAGG VPAEG VPAGG VPAGG VPAIG VPAGG 27 EBPE[G₁A₃F₂] VPGAG VPGFG VPGAG VPGGG VPGAG VPGFG 28 EBPP[G₁A₃F₂] VPAAG VPAFG VPAAG VPAGG VPAAG VPAFG 29 EBPP[K₁A₃F₂] VPAAG VPAFG VPAAG VPAGG VPAAG VPAFG 30 EBPP[D₁A₃F₂] VPAAG VPAFG VPAAG VPAGG VPAAG VPAFG 31 EBPP[K₃F₃] VPAFG VPAKG VPAFG VPAKG VPAFG VPAKG 32 EBPP[D₃F₃] VPAFG VPADG VPAFG VPADG VPAFG VPADG 33 EBPP[H₃A₃I₁] VPAHG VPAAG VPAHG VPAIG VPAHG VPAAG 34 EBPP[H₅G₁] VPAGG VPAHG VPAHG VPAHG VPAHG VPAHG 35 EBPP[G₁C₃F₂] VPACG VPAFG VPACG VPAGG VPACG VPAFG 36

In Table 1, SEQ ID NO. 3 to 10 may be classified as gene sequences for hydrophilic EBP blocks, and SEQ ID NO. 11 to 19 may be classified as gene sequences for hydrophobic EBP blocks, in which Phe and His are incorporated. In Table 2, amino acid SEQ ID NO. 20 to 27 may be classified as hydrophilic EBP blocks, and amino acid SEQ ID NO. 28 to 36, in which Phe and His are incorporated, may be classified as hydrophobic EBP blocks. In particular, in Table 2, SEQ ID NO. 22 and 23 are classified as positively charged hydrophilic EBP blocks, and SEQ ID NO. 24 to 27 are classified as negatively charged hydrophilic EBP blocks. That is, as described above, when the LCST of an EBP is lower than the body temperature, the EBP exhibits hydrophobicity, and when the LCST of an EBP is higher than the body temperature, the EBP exhibits hydrophilicity. Due to this nature of EBPs, the hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of EBPs may be relatively defined when EBPs are applied to biotechnology.

Different EBPs having a pentapeptide repeat unit, Val-Pro-(Gly or Ala)-X_(aa)-Gly [where X_(aa) may be any amino acid except Pro], which are capable of responding to unique stimuli including temperature and pH, were designed at the DNA level. EBPs with plasticity (EBPPs) having a pentapeptide repeat unit of Val-Pro-Ala-X_(aa)-Gly and EBPs with elasticity (EBPEs) having a pentapeptide repeat unit of Val-Pro-Gly-X_(aa)-Gly were all cloned to have the same guest residue composition and ratio. Tables 1 and 2 represent the gene and amino acid sequences of different EBPs having respective pentapeptide units. For example, EBPE[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ not only show almost the same molar mass, but also the fourth residues of these EBP pentapeptide units represent the same combination. In addition, these EBP blocks have different mechanical properties because the third amino acid residues (Ala or Gly) of the pentapeptide units are different. Positively and negatively charged EBPs were prepared by introducing charged amino acids such as Lys, Asp, GIu, and His as guest residues.

To anneal each pair of oligonucleotides encoding various EBPs, each oligonucleotide was prepared at a concentration of 2 μM in 50 μl of T4 DNA ligase buffer, heat treated at 95° C. for 2 minutes and then slowly cooled to room temperature over 3 hours. 4 μg of a modified pET-21a vector was digested and dephosphorylated with 15 U of BseRI and 10 U of FastAP thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase for 30 minutes at 37° C. The digested plasmid DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit, and then was eluted in 40 μl of distilled and deionized water. To ligate the annealed dsDNA, i.e., a DNA insert, into multiple cloning sites within the linearized mpET-21a vector, 90 pmol of the annealed dsDNA and 30 pmol of the linearized mpET-21a vector were incubated in T4 DNA ligase buffer containing 1 U of T4 DNA ligase for 30 minutes at 16° C. The ligated plasmid was transformed into Top10 chemically competent cells, followed by plating the Top10 competent cells on an SOC plate supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin. DNA sequences were then confirmed by DNA sequencing. After all EBP monomer genes were constructed, each EBP gene was synthesized by ligating each of 36 types of repetitive genes (as an insert) into the corresponding vector containing each of the same 36 types of repetitive genes, as follows. A cloning procedure for EBP libraries and fusions thereof are illustrated in FIG. 1. Vectors harboring gene copies corresponding to EBP monomers were digested and dephosphorylated with 10 U of XbaI, 15 U of BseRI and 10 U of FastAP thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase in CutSmart buffer for 30 minutes at 37° C. The digested plasmid DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit, and then was eluted in 40 μl of distilled and deionized water. For preparation of an insert part, a total of 4 μg of an EBP monomer gene was digested with 10 U of XbaI and 15 U of AcuI in CutSmart buffer for 30 minutes at 37° C. After digestion, the reaction product was separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and the insert was purified using a gel extraction kit. Ligation was performed by incubating 90 pmol of the purified insert with 30 pmol of the linearized vector in T4 DNA ligase buffer containing 1 U of T4 DNA ligase for 30 minutes at 16° C. The product was transformed into Top10 chemically competent cells, and then the cells were plated on an SOC plate supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin Transformants were initially screened by diagnostic restriction digestion on an agarose gel and further confirmed by DNA sequencing as described above.

As described above, EBP gene libraries having different DNA sizes were synthesized using the designed plasmid vector and three different restriction endonucleases. FIG. 1 illustrates a recursive directional ligation (RDL) method, in which EBP monomer genes are ligated to form oligomerized EBP genes. For example, a gene construct encoding EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ was prepared by ligation, wherein a plasmid backbone and an insert derived from a plasmid-borne gene vector harboring a gene encoding EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₆ were used. The plasmid-borne gene vector harboring a gene encoding EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₆ was double-digested by XbaI and AcuI to obtain an insert, i.e., a gene fragment encoding EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₆. On the other hand, the plasmid-borne gene vector for EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₆ was double-digested by XbaI and BseRI to obtain a plasmid backbone and then the plasmid backbone was dephosphorylated by treatment with an alkaline phosphatase. The RDL method using two different double restriction enzymes has several advantages. First, due to the different shapes of the protrusions of both an insert and a digested vector, self-ligation of the digested vector did not occur, and the insert and the digested vector were efficiently linked in a head-tail orientation. Second, due to the mechanism of type III restriction endonuclease, an additional DNA sequence encoding each linker between blocks is not required. Each EBP gene was oligomerized to generate 36, 72, 108, 144, 180, and 216 EBP pentapeptide repeats. Using two restriction endonucleases XbaI and BamHI, oligomerized genes with sizes of 540, 1080, 1620, 2160, 2700, and 3240 base pairs (bps) were confirmed. As characterized by agarose gel electrophoresis, FIG. 2 depicts the digested DNA bands of EBP libraries with DNA size markers on both end lanes. For example, EBPE[A₁G₄I₁] in FIG. 2(A) clearly shows a digested DNA band corresponding to a DNA region encoding an oligomerized pentapeptide sequence containing Ala, Gly, Ile in a ratio of 1:4:1 as a guest residue. All digested DNA bands are shown as corresponding lengths as compared to the molecular size markers.

EBP genes and block co-polypeptides thereof were overexpressed in E. coli having a T7 promoter and purified by multiple cycles of inverse transition cycling (ITC). FIG. 3 shows copper-stained SDS-PAGE gel images of the purified EBPs. EBPs shifted at least 20% more than theoretically calculated molecular weights. Two side-lanes on SDS-PAGE gels contain standard protein size markers (7, 15, 24, 35, 40, 50, 65, 90, 110, and 150 kDa, from bottom to top). In FIGS. 3(A) and 3(B), EBPE[A₁G₄I₁] and EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] represent a series of corresponding proteins with a molecular weight greater than a theoretical molecular weight (for EBPE[A₁G₄I₁], 14.0, 27.7, 41.3, 55.0, and 68.6 kDa, from left to right). In general, as shown in FIGS. 3(C) and 3(D), positively charged EBP libraries, including EBPE[K₁G₄I₁] and EBPP[K₁G₄I₁], showed higher molecular weights than nonpolar EBP libraries, including EBPE[A₁G₄I₁] and EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]. In addition, as shown in FIGS. 3(E) and 3(F), negatively charged EBP libraries, including EBPE[D₁G₄I₁] and EBPP[D₁G₁I₁], have differently charged characteristics, and thus exhibited higher molecular weights than positively charged EBP libraries.

EBP libraries were characterized. FIGS. 4A to 4F show thermal transition behaviors of EBPs determined by measuring optical absorbance at 350 nm (absorbance₃₅₀) at a heating rate of 1° C./min Inverse transition temperature (T_(t)) is defined as a temperature at which the first derivative (d (OD₃₅₀)/dT) of turbidity, which is a function of temperature, was the maximum. Based on environmental conditions such as a salt concentration and pH and the different third and fourth amino acids of an EBP pentapeptide repeat unit, the T_(t) of an EBP was finely controlled in PBS and PBS was supplemented with 1 to 3 M sodium chloride. For example, EBPE[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ (FIG. 4A) with Gly at the third amino acid of an EBP pentapeptide repeat exhibited a T_(t) about 15° C. higher than that of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ (FIG. 4B) with Ala at the third amino acid of an EBP pentapeptide repeat in PBS containing 1 M sodium chloride, because Gly at the third amino acid of an EBP pentapeptide repeat has a higher hydrophilicity than Ala. In general, charged EBP libraries have a higher T_(t) than nonpolar EBP libraries because charged residues are introduced into the fourth amino acid of the EBP pentapeptide repeat of the charged EBPs. Negatively charged EBP libraries, such as EBPP[D₁G₄I₁] (FIG. 4E), have different pK_(a) values for Asp and Lys at the fourth amino acid of an EBP pentapeptide repeat, and thus have a higher T_(t) than positively charged EBP libraries, such as EBPE[K₁G₄I₁] (FIG. 4C) and EBPP[K₁G₄I₁] (FIG. 4D). For reference, FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D and 4E exhibit hydrophilicity, and FIG. 4F exhibits EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ exhibit hydrophobicity.

Example 5: Gene Construction of Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]n and Anti-Flt1-EBP Diblock Block (Copolypeptides)

A pair of oligonucleotides encoding an anti-Flt1 peptide acting as a VEGFR1 antagonist were chemically synthesized by Cosmo Genetech (Seoul, Korea), and linked to an oligonucleotide cassette with cohesive ends including restriction sites recognized by AcuI and BseRI. An oligonucleotide cassette encoding the anti-Flt1 peptide was rationally designed to have no restriction sites recognized by BseRI, XbaI, AcuI and BamHI for seamless gene cloning, as shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Gene and amino acid sequences of CPPs SEQ ID NO. Sequence Type Sequence 37 Gene Sequence GGC AAT CAG TGG TTT ATT 38 Amino acid  G N Q W F I Sequence

In Table 4, the sequences, gene lengths and molecular weights of fusion polypeptides with a hydrophilic EBP block or an EBP diblock of hydrophilic EBP block-hydrophobic EBP block are shown.

TABLE 4 Sequences, gene lengths and molecular weights of fusion polypeptides Nucleotide Fusion protein (SEQ ID NO.) length (bp) M.W (kDa) Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ (SEQ ID NO. 48) 288 8.19 Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₆ (SEQ ID NO. 49) 558 15.27 Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ (SEQ ID NO. 50) 1098 29.42 Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄ (SEQ ID NO. 51) 2178 57.72 Anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ 2178 59.90 (SEQ ID NO. 52) Anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ 3258 90.00 (SEQ ID NO. 53)

Each plasmid containing an EBP with restriction sites recognized by BseRI, XbaI, AcuI and BamHI, and the oligonucleotide cassette were used to create genes for the fusion polypeptide libraries of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ and anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks. First, to anneal a pair of oligonucleotides encoding an anti-Flt1 peptide, each oligonucleotide was prepared at a concentration of 2 μM in 50 μl of T4 DNA ligase buffer, heat treated at 95° C. for 2 minutes and then the reaction solution was slowly cooled to room temperature over 3 hours. To clone the anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃, a plasmid vector encoding EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) was digested with 15 U of BseRI in CutSmart buffer for 30 minutes at 37° C. The digested plasmid DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit, and then dephosphorylated with 10 U of FastAP as a thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase in CutSmart buffer for 1 hour at 37° C. The digested and dephosphorylated plasmid DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit, and then eluted in 40 μl of distilled and deionized water. Ligation was performed by incubating 90 pmol of the purified insert and 30 pmol of the linearized vector in T4 DNA ligase buffer containing 1 U of T4 DNA ligase at 16° C. for 30 minutes. The product was transformed into Top10 chemically competent cells and the cells were plated on SOC plates supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin Transformants were initially screened by diagnostic restriction digestion on an agarose gel and further confirmed by DNA sequencing as described above.

Similarly, to clone anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks with hydrophobic blocks of different lengths, plasmid vectors encoding EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]_(n) were digested with 10 U of XbaI and 15 U of BseRI in CutSmart buffer for 30 minutes at 37° C. The digested plasmid DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit, and then dephosphorylated with 10 U of FastAP as a thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase in CutSmart buffer for 1 hour at 37° C. The digested and dephosphorylated plasmid DNA was purified using a PCR purification kit, and then eluted in 40 μl of distilled and deionized water. 4 μg of EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]_(n) genes were digested with 10 U of XbaI and 15 U of AcuI in CutSmart buffer for 30 minutes at 37° C. After digestion, the reaction product was separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and an insert was purified using a gel extraction kit. Ligation was performed by incubating 90 pmol of the purified insert and 30 pmol of the linearized vector in T4 DNA ligase buffer containing 1 U of T4 DNA ligase at 16° C. for 30 minutes. The product was transformed into Top10 chemically competent cells and the cells were plated on SOC plates supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin Transformants were initially screened by diagnostic restriction digestion on an agarose gel and further confirmed by DNA sequencing. Plasmid vectors encoding anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks were prepared using BseRI, and ligation and confirmation of ligation were performed as described above.

Example 6: Expression of Genes Encoding EBPs, Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and Anti-Flt1-EBP Diblock Block and Purification of Gene Expression Products

E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) cells were transformed with each vector containing an EBP, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) or an anti-Flt1-EBP diblock block, and then inoculated in 50 ml of CircleGrow media supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin Preculture was performed in a shaking incubator at 200 rpm overnight at 37° C. 500 ml of CircleGrow media with 50 μg/ml ampicillin was then inoculated with 50 ml of the precultured CircleGrow media and incubated in a shaking incubator at 200 rpm for 16 hours at 37° C. When optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) reached 1.0, overexpression of an EBP gene or a block polypeptide gene thereof was induced by addition of IPTG at a final concentration of 1 mM. The cells were centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 10 minutes at 4° C. The expressed EBPs and block polypeptides thereof were purified by inverse transition cycling (ITC) as reported previously. The cell pellet was resuspended in 30 ml of HEPES buffer, and the cells were lysed by sonication for 10 s in 20 s intervals (VC-505, Sonics & Materials, Inc, Danbury, Conn.) on ice. The cell lysate was centrifuged in a 50 ml centrifuge tube at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4° C. to precipitate the insoluble debris of the cell lysate. Supernatant containing soluble EBPs was then transferred to a new 50 ml centrifuge tube and centrifuged with 0.5% w/v of PEI at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4° C. to precipitate nucleic acid contaminants. The inverse phase transition of the EBPs were triggered by adding sodium chloride at a final concentration of 4 M, and aggregated EBPs were separated from the lysate solution by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4° C. The aggregated EBPs were resuspended in cold PBS buffer, and the EBP solutions were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4° C. to remove any aggregated protein contaminants. These aggregation and resuspension processes were repeated 5 to 10 times until EBP purity reached about 95%, and the purity was determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

FIG. 5A to 5D show a schematic diagram of molecular design, cloning and the anti-neovascularization function of fusion polypeptides according to the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5C, a fusion polypeptide corresponding to VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP forms a temperature-triggered core-shell micellar structure with a multivalent VEGFR-targeting peptide under physiological conditions.

As shown in FIG. 5D (i), a fusion polypeptide corresponding to VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP may act as a therapeutic polypeptide due to strong non-covalent interactions between VEGFRs (in particular, VEGFR1) and the anti-Flt1 peptide. As shown in FIG. 5D (ii), a fusion polypeptide corresponding to VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP forms a micelle with a multivalent anti-Flt1 peptide, which increases the binding affinity of the fusion polypeptide for VEGFRs. Thus, use of the fusion polypeptide may enhance therapeutic efficacy for diseases associated with neovascularization. To minimize rapid degradation of anti-Flt1 peptides and to present anti-Flt1 peptides, as in vivo receptor antagonists, EBPs were introduced to an anti-Flt1 peptide as non-chromatographic purification polypeptide tags and as stabilizers.

Modified pET-21a (mpET-21a) plasmids harboring EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(n), EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]_(n) or EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]_(n) (where the subscript number n of [X_(i)Y_(j)Z_(k)]_(n) is 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 or 36) were seamlessly cloned using standard molecular biology methodology. In particular, multimerization and fusion of EBPP genes were executed using recursive directional ligation (RDL) to construct genes encoding EBPPs with different molecular weights and EBPP block copolymers. FIG. 5A shows one method of gene cloning, by which genes for two different EBPPs and genes for an oligonucleotide cassette encoding an anti-Flt1 peptide were combined to prepare a gene for anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄. An mpET-21a plasmid harboring EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ was double-digested with XbaI and BseRI and dephosphorylated to prepare a linearized vector, whereas an mpET-21a plasmid harboring EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂ was double-digested with XbaI and BseRI to prepare an insert. After ligation, a gene for a EBPP diblock of EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ was prepared. The cloned gene was digested with BseRI, dephosphorylated, and fused with an oligonucleotide cassette encoding an anti-Fill peptide to prepare anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄. Similarly, a series of genes for anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3, 6, 12, 24) and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]_(12, 24) were cloned, and fusion polypeptides thereof were synthesized from plasmid-borne genes in E. coli, as shown in FIG. 1 (B).

In VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP-fusion polypeptide, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3, 6, 12, 24) is soluble under physiological conditions and acts as a VEGFR antagonist to compete with VEGF, thereby inhibiting delivery of neovascularization signals to cells (FIG. 5D(i)). In an embodiment of the present invention, EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(n) was selected because EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(n) of all lengths is hydrophilic at body temperature without any charged amino acid residues, and because EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(n) helps to provide an understanding of the correlation between EBPP length and binding affinity of an anti-Flt1 peptide according to EBPP blocks of four different lengths of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3, 6, 12, 24). Furthermore, as shown in FIGS. 5c and 5d (ii), a fusion polypeptide[anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]_(12, 24)] of VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP may form a temperature-triggered core-shell micellar structure with a multivalent VEGFR1-targeting peptide because of amphiphilic properties of hydrophilic EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and hydrophobic EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]_(12, 24) under physiological conditions. In addition, these properties enhance the binding affinity of the fusion peptides to VEGFRs and allow the fusion peptides to have high adhesion. In particular, hydrophobic EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]_(12, 24) of two different lengths was used for micelle size control, and was used to study the effects of micelle size on the binding affinity of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]_(12, 24) to VEGFRs.

Example 7: Characterization of EBPs, Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and Anti-Flt1-EBP Diblock Block

The purity of EBPs, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks was determined by SDS-PAGE, and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 1260 series instrument (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, Calif., U.S.) using a Shodex GPC OHpak SB-804 HQ column (Showa Denko Co., Tokyo, Japan). Deionized water at 20° C. was used as an eluent at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and the GPC column was maintained at 20° C. Low dispersity pullulan in a range of 5,900 to 200,000 g/mol was used as a standard. A series of EBPs, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks were analyzed using a refractive index detector (RID) and variable wavelength detector (VWD) at 280 nm. An effect of temperature on the inverse phase transition of various EBPs, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks at 25 μM concentration in PBS was determined by measuring OD₃₅₀ using a Cary 100 Bio UV/Vis spectrophotometer equipped with a multi-cell thermoelectric temperature controller (Varian Instruments, Walnut Creek, Calif.) between 10 to 85° C. at a heating rate of 1° C./min Self-assembly behaviors of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP [E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ from soluble unimers into micelles were characterized using a temperature-controlled Nano ZS90 (ZEN3690) dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument (Malvern instruments, Worcestershire, UK), and the hydrodynamic radius (R_(H)) thereof at 25 μM in PBS was measured in 11 successive runs at each temperature in a temperature range from 18 to 50° C. at a heating rate of 1° C./min. In addition, T_(t) thereof is defined as the onset temperature for phase transition, and calculated from each DLS plot.

Genes for fusion polypeptides composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide and hydrophilic EBP blocks with different lengths were constructed by molecular cloning and the lengths of those genes digested with XbaI and BseRI were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis as shown in FIG. 6(A). The DNA length of each gene encoding anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₆, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ or anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄ (354, 624, 1164 or 2244 bp, from left to right) is indicated below the respective gene fragments. Since DNA sequences digested by XbaI and BseRI are located outside genes encoding the fusion polypeptides, the DNA lengths of the genes are 66 base pairs longer than original gene lengths shown in Table 4. The fusion polypeptides composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide and EBP blocks with different chain lengths were expressed in E. coli and purified by ITC, as previously reported for the temperature-responsive EBPs. A copper-stained SDS-PAGE gel (4 to 20% gradient) shown in FIG. 6(B) shows the following: Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(n) (subscript n is 3, 6, 12, or 24) was purified to have a homogeneity of at least 95% by an average of five rounds of ITC as characterized by HPLC. Compared to a standard protein migration distance, each fusion polypeptide shifted about 20% more than theoretical molecular weights shown in Table 4, which is in good agreement with previous studies. The expected molecular weights of the fusion polypeptides are indicated below each band (8.19, 15.27, 29.42 and 57.72 kDa, from left to right), and lanes at both ends of the SDS-PAGE gel represent standard protein size markers (7, 15, 24, 35, 40, 50, 65, 90, 110, and 150 kDa, from bottom to top).

FIG. 7 shows the thermal transition behaviors of EBP blocks and the thermal transition behaviors of fusion polypeptides composed of an anti-Flt1 peptide and EBP blocks with different chain lengths. Based on the thermal transition behaviors, the effect of EBP block length, sodium chloride concentration and anti-Flt1 peptide fusion on transition temperature (Ti) may be investigated. Turbidity profiles in FIG. 7 were obtained by measuring the absorbance of (A to C) 25 μM EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: integer) and (D to F) 25 μM anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I]_(3n) (n: integer) in 10 mM PBS (A and D) and in 10 mM PBS supplemented with 1 M sodium chloride (B and E) or 2 M sodium chloride (C and F) at 350 nm while heating samples at a rate of 1° C./min. T_(t) is defined as the inflection point of each thermal plot in FIG. 7 and summarized in Table 5.

TABLE 5 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) 0M NaCl N/A N/A N/A 68 N/A N/A 67 57 1M NaCl N/A 80 52 42 N/A 57 45 39 2M NaCl N/A 53 34 28 49 34 28 23 T₁ of (a) EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃, (b) EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₆, (c) EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, (d) EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄, (e) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃, (f) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₆, (g) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and (h) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄

T_(t) values in Table 5 are determined by measuring the inflection points of thermal profiles in FIG. 7. Transition temperature was changed depending on EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] block length and sodium chloride concentration.

In general, EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and anti-Flt1-EBPP [A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) without polar amino acid residues exhibit T_(t) higher than 37° C. under physiological conditions because Ala, Gly and Ile were introduced to the EBPPs as the guest residue of the repetitive pentapeptide unit of the EBPPs in a ratio of 1:4:1. Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) was hydrophilic and VEGFR binding-fusion polypeptides thereof were soluble under physiological conditions, which allowed the polypeptides to specifically bind to VEGFRs without any steric hindrance. Thus, the fusion polypeptides of the present invention may act as VEGFR antagonists against VEGF. Furthermore, when the effect of EBPP block length and ionic strength on thermal responsiveness was analyzed, as the EBP block length of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n), and sodium chloride concentration in PBS increased, T_(t) thereof decreased. In particular, the T_(t) of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) was much lower than that of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) because Gly-Asn-Gln-Trp-Phe-Ile (GNQWFI) of an anti-Flt1 peptide sequence for targeting VEGFRs was hydrophobic, resulting in a decrease in the T_(t) of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n). For example, the T_(t) of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and the T_(t) of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄ were about 18 and 11° C. lower than those of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₂₄ in PBS, respectively. A T_(t) difference (DT_(t)) between EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ was more than 36° C. in PBS with 2 M sodium chloride, whereas DT_(t) between EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ was 23° C. in PBS with 1 M sodium chloride. Therefore, as EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] block length became shorter, the T_(t) of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) was greatly decreased irrespective of various concentrations of sodium chloride. This data indicates that the effect of hydrophobicity of the anti-Flt1 peptide on the thermal transition of the EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] block is potentially greater.

Next, the properties of fusion polypeptides composed of VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP are described. Two different genes, which encode a fusion polypeptide composed of “anti-Flt1 peptide” and “amphiphilic EBP diblock” of hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP having hydrophobic EBP blocks with various chain lengths, were constructed using RDL, a seamless molecular cloning method. The full lengths of those genes digested by XbaI and BseRI were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis as shown in FIG. 8(A). The DNA length of each gene encoding (a) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ or (b) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ (2244 and 3324 bp, from left to right) is indicated below each gene fragment. Since DNA sequences digested by XbaI and BseRI are located outside genes encoding the fusion polypeptides, the lengths of these genes are 66 base pairs longer than the original gene lengths of the fusion polypeptides the shown in Table 4. Two different anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides including (a) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and (b) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ were expressed in E. coli and purified by one among non-chromatographic purification methods, ITC as described above for purification of a series of temperature-responsive anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n). The image of a copper-stained SDS-PAGE gel (4 to 20% gradient) in FIG. 8(B) shows the following: Both anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ were purified by an average of five rounds of ITC, each with one major polypeptide band. Compared to a standard protein migration distance, each fusion polypeptide shifted about 20% more than theoretical molecular weights shown in Table 4. In addition, as characterized by HPLC, after an average of five rounds of ITC runs, each polypeptide had a homogeneity of at least 95%. The expected molecular weights of the polypeptides are indicated below each band (59.9 and 90.0 kDa, from left to right), and lanes at both ends of the SDS-PAGE gel represent standard protein size markers (7, 15, 24, 35, 40, 50, 65, 90, 110, and 150 kDa, from bottom to top).

FIG. 9 shows the thermal transition behaviors of anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ depending on the length and concentration of a hydrophobic EBPP[G₁A₃F₂] block. Turbidity profiles were obtained by measuring absorbance at 350 nm at four different concentrations (12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μM) in 10 mM PBS at a heating rate of 1° C./min. As described above, T_(t) was measured as the inflection point of each thermal plot in FIG. 9 and summarized in Table 6 below.

TABLE 6 (a) (b) (c) (d) Conc. (uM) 25 25 12.5 25 50 100 12.5 25 50 100 First T_(t) 39.02 29.12 34.2 36.2 37.4 39.5 26.7 28.0 29.1 29.2 (° C.) Second T_(t) N/A N/A 78.2 81.2 82.3 84.4 74.6 78.0 79.2 81.2 (° C.) T₁ of (a) EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂, (b) EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄, (c) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and (d) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄

T_(t) values in Table 6 are determined by measuring the inflection points of thermal profiles in FIG. 7. The first phase transition occurred as a result of hydrophobic block aggregation, and was greatly affected by the length of EBPP[A₁G₃F₂]. The fusion polypeptides thereof had the same polar EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂ block. The second phase transition was affected by a polar EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂ block, and the fusion polypeptides thereof had a similar second T_(t)

As the concentration of anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks increased, the first T_(t) and the second T_(t) gradually decreased. In general, the temperature-triggered phase transition of anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides occurs twice, because aliphatic- and hydrophobic EBPP[A₁G₃F₂] block having a low T_(t) and polar- and hydrophilic EBPP[E₁G₄I₁] block having a high T_(t) exhibit different thermal properties. The phase transition of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ occurred at 36.2 and 81.2° C. at the 25 μM concentration, whereas the phase transition of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ occurred at 28.0 and 78.0° C. at the same concentration. This data indicates that the doubled block length of the hydrophobic EBPP[A₁G₃F₂] has a significant effect on the first T_(t) and the second T_(t), lowering the same by 8.2 and 3.2° C., respectively. In particular, diblock polypeptides of EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ without anti-Flt1 fusion, as a control, exhibited a first T_(t) of only 39.0 and 29.1° C. without an additional phase transition, as shown in FIG. 9(A). On the other hand, anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides clearly exhibited a lowered first T_(t) and second T_(t) as opposed to the phase transition behavior of diblock polypeptides without anti-Flt1, because fusion of a hydrophobic anti-Flt1 peptide (Gly-Asn-Gln-Trp-Phe-Ile (GNQWFI)) and the hydrophilic EBPP[E₁G₄I₁] block of diblock polypeptides greatly decreased the first T_(t) of EBPP[G₁A₃F₂] and the second T_(t) of a hydrophilic EBPP[E₁G₄I₁] block, which was due to the proximity of these blocks. Furthermore, in anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides, EBPP[A₁G₃F₂] and EBPP[E₁G₄I₁], with block lengths adjusted at exactly 1:1 and 1:2 ratios, created a unique metastable micelle phase right above the first T_(t) thereof, which indicated that the thermally-triggered amphiphilic anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides self-assembled into a metastable micelle. At this time, the metastable micelle continued to develop as a stable micelle in a temperature range from the first T_(t) to the second T_(t). This is in good agreement with the self-assembly behaviors of diblock polypeptides of EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ that are not fused with anti-Flt1, as in a EBP-based diblock copolymer-based micelle reported previously.

In accordance with the unique thermal transition of anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides, the self-assembly behaviors of anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ from soluble unimers into micelles were characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The hydrodynamic radius (R_(H)) thereof at 25 μM in PBS was measured in 11 successive runs at each temperature in a temperature range from 18 to 50° C. at a heating rate of 1° C./min. T_(t) thereof was defined as the onset temperature for phase transition, calculated from each DLS plot in FIG. 10, and summarized in Table 7 below.

TABLE 7 T_(t) of (a) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and (b) anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ (a) (b) First T_(t) (° C.) Second T_(t) (° C.) First T_(t) (° C.) Second T_(t) (° C.) Absorbance 36.2 82.3 28.0 79.2 DLS 36.0 N/A 27.0 N/A

Referring to Table 7, the first aggregation of fusion polypeptides increases the hydrodynamic radius thereof due to micelle formation.

Anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides existed in soluble unimer forms below the first T_(t) of 36° C. for anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and below the first T_(t) of 27° C. for anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄, and the hydrodynamic radius (R_(H)) thereof at 25 μM in PBS was about 10 nm. As temperature increased above the first T_(t), the R_(H) thereof instantaneously increased in a range of 160 and 240 nm at a slightly higher temperature than the first T_(t), then decreased to 28.4 and 43.6 nm. The anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides formed metastable micelles due to non-equilibrium thermodynamics of amphiphile-based self-assembly and different hydrophilic-to-hydrophobic block length ratios, and then the copolypeptides formed stable micelles with constant R_(H) values even at 50° C. because self-assembly thereof reached equilibrium. The R_(H) of an anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ micelle was 15.2 nm larger than that of the anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ micelle due to the doubled block length of EBPP[G₁A₃F₂] and the bigger aggregated domain of the EBPP[G₁A₃F₂] block at the core of the micellar structure thereof. Furthermore, to determine the critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) of the anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides, the micelle sizes thereof at various concentrations in a range of 0.1 to 25 μM were measured at 20° C. below T_(t) and 37° C. above T_(t). Under environmental conditions of 0.5 μM and 37° C., the anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ still formed a metastable micelle with a R_(H) of ˜125 nm and the anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ formed a stabilized micelle with a R_(H) of ˜44 nm. However, no micelle formation was observed for the two anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides at 0.1 μM and 37° C., indicating that the 0.1 μM concentration was lower than CMCs thereof, and the CMCs were in a range of 0.1 to 0.5 μM. Therefore, the anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides formed temperature-triggered core-corona micellar structures with multivalent anti-Flt1 peptides for targeting Flt1 under physiological conditions because of the amphiphilic properties of hydrophilic EBPP[E₁G₄I₁] and hydrophobic EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]. In particular, in the anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides, different block lengths of hydrophobic EBPP[G₁A₃F₂] finely controlled micellar size, which affected the binding affinity thereof to Flt1, resulting in high adhesion.

Example 8: Determination of Specific Binding of Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and Anti-Flt1-EBP Diblock Block to Flt1

Specific binding of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: 1, 2, 4, and 8) and anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides to Flt1 was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). First, to coat a 96 well plate with recombinant human VEGF165 protein (rhVEGF₁₆₅) (M.W. 38.4 kDa) present in a disulfide-linked homodimer, 50 μl of a solution containing the rhVEGF₁₆₅ at a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was added to the 96 well plate, and the plated was incubated at 4° C. overnight. The wells of the 96 well plate coated with the rhVEGF₁₆₅ were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 to completely remove unattached rhVEGF₁₆₅, and then the wells were incubated with PBS containing 3 wt % BSA at room temperature for 2 hours to block the surface of each well, which was not coated with the rhVEGF₁₆₅. After incubation, the wells were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 to remove unbound BSA. Next, to impart specific binding affinity between an anti-Flt1 peptide and Flt1 (VEGFR1), a recombinant human Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein (M.W. 200.0 kDa) present in a disulfide-linked homodimer at a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml was pre-incubated with (1) anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: 1, 2, 4, and 8) in PBS containing 1 wt % BSA or with (2) anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides (anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP [G₁A₃F₂] 12 and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄) with hydrophobic blocks of different lengths. In this case, the pre-incubation was carried out at room temperature for 2 hours at different concentrations within a range of 0.5 to 500 μM. Thereafter, the mixed solution was added to rhVEGF₁₆₅-coated wells, followed by additional incubation at room temperature for 2 hours. The EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and EBP diblock copolypeptide (EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄) with hydrophobic blocks (having the same concentration) of different lengths were used as a standard. Each well was washed with PBS supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20 to remove Flt1-F_(c) protein that was not bound to rhVEGF₁₆₅ on the surface of the well. Whether human Flt1-F_(c) protein was specifically bound to the rhVEGF₁₆₅-coated well was determined by measuring the absorbance of oxidized chromogenic substrates upon protein-antibody binding at 450 nm using rabbit anti-human IgG F_(c)-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugates as a secondary antibody. PBS (containing 0.3 w % BSA) diluted with anti-human IgG F_(c)-HRP was added to each well and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by washing 8 times with PBS containing 0.05 Tween-20. 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added to each well to indirectly determine the degree of specific binding of Flt1-F_(c) protein to VEGF by measuring the specific interaction between the Flt1-F_(c) protein and the anti-human IgG F_(c)-HRP protein, and HRP-catalyzed oxidation of the TMB. The color intensity of the oxidized TMB was measured at 450 nm. Each ELISA experiment was performed three times for reproducibility.

The specific binding properties of a fusion polypeptide of VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP are examined. As shown in FIG. 11, the specific binding of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: integer) fusion polypeptides was characterized by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). First, 38.4 kDa recombinant human VEGF₁₆₅ protein present in a disulfide-linked homodimer was coated on wells, and then the wells were blocked by bovine serum albumin (BSA). A 200.0 kDa recombinant human Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein present in a disulfide-linked homodimer was incubated with anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: 1, 2, 4, and 8) at different concentrations within a range of 0.5 to 500 μM to induce specific binding between each other, and then the mixed solution was added to the VEGF-coated wells, followed by incubation for 2 hours at room temperature. Human Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein was specifically bound to the VEGF-coated wells was determined by measuring the absorbance of oxidized chromogenic substrates upon protein-antibody binding at 450 nm using rabbit anti-human IgG F_(c)-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugates as a secondary antibody. Regardless of different concentrations, EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ did not significantly inhibit specific binding between the Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein and VEGF. Contrary to the minimal inhibitory effect of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ with respect to the specific binding, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) copolypeptides significantly inhibited an interaction between Flt1-F_(c) and VEGF in a dose-dependent manner independent of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] block length. These results indicate that anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) has a high specific binding capacity to a human Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein, which may prevent the human Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein from binding to VEGF. In particular, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ showed a maximum inhibitory effect of about 75% at 500 μM, whereas anti-Flt1-EBPP [A₁G₄I₁]₂₄ had a lower inhibitory effect than anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, which might be the consequence of steric hindrance caused by an extended EBPP[A₁G₄I₁] chain length. Although hydrophilic EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ blocks with different chain lengths were introduced to anti-Flt1 peptides as VEGFR1-specific antagonists, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) copolypeptides retained high specificity of the anti-Flt1 peptide for Flt1, due to the inert nature of EBPs. In contrast to conventional peptide-polymer conjugates such as anti-Flt1 peptide-hyaluronate (HA) conjugates, the anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) copolypeptides were prepared at the gene level, and imparted the monodisperse molecular weight and enhanced stabilization of an anti-Flt1 peptide due to the inert nature of EBPs acting like PEG This monodisperse molecular weight and stability might increase the half-life of the anti-Flt1 peptide in vivo.

Next, the binding properties of fusion polypeptides of VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP are examined With specific binding of soluble anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) to a human Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein, anti-Flt1-EBP diblock blocks (anti-Flt1-EBPP [E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP [G₁A₃F₂]₂₄) with hydrophobic blocks of different lengths formed temperature-triggered core-shell micellar structures with multivalent anti-Flt1 peptides under physiological conditions. Multivalent anti-Flt1 located on the outer shell of the formed self-assembled micelles increased the binding affinity of the fusion polypeptides to human Flt1 (VEGFR1). As measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in FIG. 12, as the concentrations of fusion polypeptides of anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP increased, specific binding between Flt1-F_(c) and VEGF was significantly inhibited by the fusion polypeptides, which is in good agreement with the results of the example for soluble anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n). Unlike the degree of inhibition of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) fusion polypeptides with respect to specific binding between Flt1-F_(c) and VEGF, anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ micelles with a R_(H) of ˜125 nm in a metastable state showed a dramatically enhanced inhibitory effect (95%) on specific binding between Flt1-F_(c) and VEGF depending on the spatial multivalent display of Flt1-targeting peptides on the micelles. On the other hand, anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₂₄ micelles with a R_(H) of ˜44 nm in a stable state exhibited a similar inhibition degree compared with the degree of inhibition of soluble anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) blocks. Although the two anti-Flt1-EBP diblock copolypeptides formed micelles in a concentration range from 0.5 to 500 μM at 37° C. under physiological conditions, the peptides showed a much different degree of inhibition with respect to specific binding between Flt1-F_(c) and VEGF based on the stability of micelles thereof, potentially due to different binding affinities between the Flt1-F_(c) and the controlled spatial display of the multivalent anti-Flt1 peptides of the micellar nanostructures. Importantly, anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ micelles at 250 μM had a greater inhibitory effect than anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ fusion polypeptides at 500 μM, which suggested that a lower dose of the anti-Flt1-EBPP[E₁G₄I₁]₁₂-EBPP[G₁A₃F₂]₁₂ might have a higher binding affinity to the human Flt1 protein in vivo for anti-neovascularization.

Example 9: In Vitro Tubing Assay of HUVECs Using Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂

In vitro tubing assay of HUVECs using soluble anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ was performed to evaluate effects of the soluble anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ copolypeptides on proliferation, migration and tube formation of endothelial cells. For Matrigel coating, 200 μl of 8.7 mg/ml Matrigel was added to a 48 well plate and incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour to become solidified. To label HUVECs with fluorescence, HUVECs were incubated with 10 μM calcein-AM at 37° C. for 15 minutes and washed with PBS several times. The calcein-labeled HUVECs at 2×10⁴ cells/well were grown on the Matrigel-coated wells, and incubated at 37° C. for 4 hours with 50 ng/ml recombinant human rhVEGF₁₆₅ and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ as a Flt1-specific antagonist at different concentrations. After incubation, it was determined whether proliferation, migration and tube formation of endothelial cells were stimulated. To clarify to what extent anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ could inhibit tube formation of HUVECs, the same concentration of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ was assessed as a control. In addition, Avastin, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) against VEGF, was used as another control to compare therapeutic efficacy for anti-neovascularization based on the therapeutic efficacy of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, as a Flt1-specific antagonist. The tube formation of HUVECs was photographed with Micromanipulator (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and quantified by measuring whole tube lengths in three random fields per well with Image lab software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif., USA). When the tubing assay was performed, the tube formation of HUVECs incubated in PBS for 4 hours was used as a control. The experiment was repeated three times.

As shown in FIG. 11, based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results, it was confirmed that anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) (n: integer) fusion polypeptides had a high specific binding capacity to the human Flt1-F_(c) chimeric protein, and 29.4 kDa anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ showed a maximum degree of inhibition compared with soluble anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) fusion polypeptides with different EBP chain lengths. Accordingly, the effects of soluble anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ fusion polypeptides on proliferation, migration and tube formation of endothelial cells were assessed in HUVECs in vitro. Calcein-labeled HUVECs at 2×10⁴ cells/well were grown on a 48 well plate pre-coated with Matrigel, 50 ng/ml recombinant human rhVEGF₁₆₅ was treated to stimulate proliferation, migration and tube formation of endothelial cells, and anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ acting as a Flt1 (VEGFR1)-specific antagonist was treated at different concentrations, followed by incubation. The same concentration of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ was used as a control to clearly show to what extent anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ could inhibit the tube formation of HUVECs. In addition, Avastin (also named bevacizumab), a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) against VEGF, was used as a control to compare therapeutic efficacy for anti-neovascularization. Avastin has been widely used to treat various neovascular eye diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy, based on specific binding between Avastin and VEGF. Based on specific binding of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₃ to the human Flt1 protein in the membrane of HUVECs, it was assumed that the inhibitory effects of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) and Avastin on the tube formation of HUVECs were caused by specific protein-protein interactions, while Avastin bound to rhVEGF₁₆₅ and minimized rhVEGF₁₆₅-triggered cellular signaling for the tube formation and neovascularization of HUVECs. As characterized by in vitro tubing assay of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, fluorescence images of calcein-AM labeled HUVECs and the degree of inhibition of tube formation based on the normalized tube length of HUVECs in the images were shown in FIG. 13. The tube length of HUVECs was measured by tracking the fluorescence signal of HUVECs, averaged under each condition, and the tube length of HUVECs incubated in PBS for 4 hours was used as a baseline. A tube length when HUVECs were treated with rhVEGF₁₆₅ for 4 hours was set at 100%, and tube length at each concentration was normalized. The tube length of HUVECs incubated with EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ as a control was similar to that of HUVECs treated with rhVEGF₁₆₅, indicating that EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ had no significant effect on the tube formation of HUVECs. On the other hand, in the case of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ as a Flt1-specific antagonist, as the concentration of the anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ increased in a range of 0.1 to 10 μM, the tube length of HUVECs gradually decreased. In accordance with decrease of the tube length of HUVECs when incubated with anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂, fluorescence images clearly show that the degree of inhibition of migration and tube formation of HUVECs became evident as the concentration of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ increased. These results indicate that anti-Flt-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ inhibits the tube formation of HUVECs and the degree of inhibition is greatly controlled by the concentration of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂. In particular, HUVECs incubated with 10 μM anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ showed no significant migration and tube formation even in the presence of rhVEGF₁₆₅, which was similar to use of Avastin at 0.2 mg/ml. Therefore, as validated by ELISA, the anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ fusion polypeptides still retained high specificity of an anti-Flt1 peptide against Flt1.

Example 10: In Vivo Anti-Neovascularization Using Anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ in Laser-Induced Choroidal Neovascularization Model

6- to 8-week-old female C57BL-6 mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of ketamine at 100 mg/kg and xylazine at 10 mg/kg, and the pupils were dilated with 5 mg/ml tropicamide, and 532 nm laser diode (150 to 210 mW, 0.1 sec, 50 to 100 μM) was applied to each fundus to induce choroidal neovascularization in vivo. Multiple burns were performed in the 6, 9, 12, and 3 o'clock positions of the posterior pole of the eye with a slit-lamp delivery system. Production of bubbles at the time of laser, which indicates Bruch's membrane rupturing, is an important factor in obtaining the CNV model. To evaluate an effect of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) copolypeptides on anti-neovascularization in a laser-induced choroidal neovascularization model in vivo, the CNV model mice were injected in an intravitreal manner with PBS as a vehicle, EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ or various concentrations of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ once a day for 5 days and anesthetized after 14 days with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine at 100 mg/kg and xylazine at 10 mg/kg. The mice were treated with retro-orbital injection of 100 μl ultrapure water containing 25 mg/ml FITC-dextran. Enucleated eyes were then fixed in 10% formalin for 30 minutes at room temperature. The cornea, iris, lens, and vitreous humor were gently removed under a stereomicroscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Four radial incisions were made in the dissected retina, which was then flattened with a coverslip. Each in vivo anti-neovascularization experiment was performed with three replicates.

By ELISA and HUVEC tubing assay, it was demonstrated that anti-Flt1-EBPP[A G₄I₁]_(3n) fusion polypeptides retained anti-neovascularization activity as an antagonist against VEGFR1. The present inventors hypothesized that anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) fusion polypeptides might show a therapeutic activity with respect to neovascularization-related eye diseases (in particular, retinal neovascular disease, age-related macular degeneration (AMD)). Intravitreal injection of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ was evaluated for the suppression of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV), which was an animal model for AMD, in C57BL-6 mice. Daily injection of protein solutions started immediately after laser injury and maintained for 5 days. Injection of a vehicle (PBS) or EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ was used as a negative control. CNV lesion volumes were imagined and evaluated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran perfused whole choroidal flat-mounts at day 14 after laser injury (FIG. 14A). Quantitative analysis showed that doses of 0.1, 1, 5 and 20 μg of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ per day for 5 days (in total 0.5, 5, 25 and 100 μg) suppressed CNV lesion size by 32%, 52.3% (P<0.05), 54.4% (P<0.05), and 25.9%, respectively, as compared with PBS control mice (FIG. 14B). The CNV lesion sizes of an EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂-treated animal had values similar to those of a PBS-treated animal. The suppressive effect of EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ on a CNV lesion showed a dose dependent manner in a range from 0.5 to 25 μg in total. However, 100 μg anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ showed a reduced effect on suppression of the CNV lesion, potentially due to an excessive dose of anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂.

Binding affinity of a targeting ligand against a growth factor receptor (GFR) in cells is important for various diseases associated with cell growth such as neovascularization, because the binding affinity determines whether intracellular signaling will proceed. In the present invention, VEGFR-targeting fusion polypeptides, which are composed of thermally responsive elastin-based polypeptides (EBPs) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeting peptides, were genetically manipulated, expressed, and purified and the physicochemical properties thereof were analyzed. The EBPs were introduced as non-chromatographic purification tags and also introduced as a stabilizer, like a poly(ethylene glycol) conjugate, for minimizing rapid in vivo degradation of VEGFR-targeting peptides. In addition, the VEGFR-targeting peptide was introduced to function as a receptor antagonist by specifically binding to VEGFRs.

A fusion polypeptide composed of VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP exhibited a soluble unimer form. On the other hand, a fusion polypeptide composed of VEGFR-targeting peptide (anti-Flt1 peptide)-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP exhibited a temperature-triggered core-shell micellar structure with a multivalent VGFR-targeting peptide under physiological conditions. As analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), this structure greatly increased the binding affinity of the fusion polypeptide for VEGF receptors. Depending on the spatial display of a VEGFR-targeting peptide, the binding affinity of the fusion polypeptides to VEGFRs was greatly regulated.

An anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]_(3n) fusion polypeptide (anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP), which existed as a soluble unimer form below a transition temperature, showed a high anti-neovascularization effect in a CNV model as compared with a EBPP block as a control. In addition, an anti-Flt1-EBP diblock fusion polypeptide (anti-Flt1 peptide-hydrophilic EBP-hydrophobic EBP) formed a temperature-triggered, self-assembled multivalent micellar nanostructure under physiological conditions, resulting in a great difference in the degree of inhibition with respect to specific binding between Flt1-F_(c) and VEGF depending on the stability of the micellar nanostructure thereof. In the tube formation assay of HUVECs in vitro, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ greatly reduced tube formation, whereas EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ had no significant effect on tube formation, which was due to specific interactions between the anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ and Flt1 (VEGFR1) on the HUVEC membrane. Finally, in the laser-induced CNV model of mice, anti-Flt1-EBPP[A₁G₄I₁]₁₂ showed a high anti-neovascularization effect. Therefore, this fusion polypeptide and the self-assembled multivalent micellar nanostructure thereof with an anti-Flt1 may be used as a therapeutic polypeptide targeting neovascularization, such as treatment of retinal, corneal, choroidal neovascularization, tumor growth, cancer metastasis, diabetic retinopathy, and asthma.

A fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization of the present invention can provide a new direction for a drug delivery system for anti-neovascularization, such as treatment of retinal, corneal, choroidal neovascularization, tumor growth, cancer metastasis, diabetic retinopathy, and asthma. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A fusion polypeptide for inhibiting neovascularization, comprising: a peptide specifically binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors; and a hydrophilic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophilic EBP) linked to the peptide, wherein the fusion polypeptide further comprises a hydrophobic elastin-based polypeptide (hydrophobic EBP) linked to the hydrophilic EBP, and the hydrophobic EBP is consisted of an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 1 or 2 below: Formula 1 [SEQ ID NO. 1]n; or   Formula 2 [SEQ ID NO. 2]n, wherein   SEQ ID NO. 1 is consisted of [VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG VPGXG];   SEQ ID NO. 2 is consisted of [VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG VPAXG];

n is an integer of 1 or more, and represents the number of repeats of SEQ ID NO. 1 or SEQ ID NO. 2; and X is an amino acid other than proline, is selected from any natural or artificial amino acids when the pentapeptide VPGXG or VPAXG is repeated, and at least one of X is a hydrophobic or aliphatic amino acid.
 2. The fusion polypeptide according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic EBP is consisted of an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 1 or 2: in Formula 1, n is 1, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of G (Gly), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 28], or in Formula 2, n is 1, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of, G (Gly), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 29]; K (Lys), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 30]; D (Asp), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 31]; K (Lys) and F (Phe) in a ratio of 3:3 [SEQ ID NO. 32]; D (Asp) and F (Phe) in a ratio of 3:3 [SEQ ID NO. 33]; H (His), A (Ala), and I (Ile) in a ratio of 3:2:1 [SEQ ID NO. 34]; H (His) and G (Gly) in a ratio of 5:1 [SEQ ID NO. 35]; or G (Gly), C (Cys), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 36].
 3. The fusion polypeptide according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic EBP is consisted of an amino acid sequence represented by Formula 2: in Formula 2, n is 12, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of G (Gly), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 46], or in Formula 2, n is 24, and each X of the pentapeptide repeats is consisted of G (Gly), A (Ala), and F (Phe) in a ratio of 1:3:2 [SEQ ID NO. 47].
 4. The fusion polypeptide according to claim 1, wherein the fusion polypeptide is consisted of an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ ID NO. 52 or SEQ ID NO.
 53. 5. The fusion polypeptide according to claim 1, wherein the fusion polypeptide forms a self-assembled nanostructure having a core-shell structure, when the hydrophobic EBP forms a core structure and the hydrophilic EBP and the VEGF receptor-specific peptide form a shell structure by a temperature stimulus.
 6. The fusion polypeptide according to claim 5, wherein the self-assembled nanostructure comprises a multivalent VEGF receptor-specific peptide as a shell.
 7. A composition for treating diseases caused by neovascularization, comprising the fusion polypeptide of claim 1, wherein the fusion polypeptide forms a self-assembled nanostructure having a core-shell structure, when a hydrophobic EBP forms a core structure and a hydrophilic EBP and a VEGF receptor-specific peptide form a shell structure by a temperature stimulus, and the self-assembled nanostructure comprises a multivalent VEGF receptor-specific peptide as a shell, whereby binding affinity between the self-assembled nanostructure and a VEGF receptor increases, and VEGF fails to bind to the VEGF receptor, thereby inhibiting neovascularization.
 8. The composition according to claim 7, wherein the diseases caused by neovascularization is any one or more selected from the group comprising diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity, macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, neovascular glaucoma, eye diseases caused by corneal neovascularization, corneal transplant rejection, corneal edema, corneal opacity, cancer, hemangioma, hemangiofibroma, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis. 